Help me Iconoclast. Does the threat of a lawsuit really require Fayetteville to annex a pie-in-the-sky developers’ wet dream south of town? Do the wheeler dealers have an absolute right to be annexed? Do they have an absolute right to force the city to accept their terms on building infrastructure? If so, the unhappy council member quoted here may be right. What’s the point of the council even meeting?

UPDATE: The Iconoclast is all over it.

Advertisement

Help to Keep Great Journalism Alive in Arkansas

Join the fight for truth and become a subscriber of the Arkansas Times. We've been battling powerful forces for 50 years through our tough, determined, and feisty journalism. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, our readers value great journalism. But we need your help to do even more. By subscribing and supporting our efforts, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers to expand our coverage. Together, we can continue to hold the powerful accountable and bring important stories to light. Subscribe now or donate for as little as $1 and be a part of the Arkansas Times community.

Previous article Thanks, but no thanks Next article The Proctor case