Gov. Mike Beebe is right. Starting a new lottery-backed scholarship program with existing surpluses in 2009, as Lt. Gov. Bill Halter proposes, isn’t prudent.

But Beebe’s feelings — as expressed here — that existing scholarship programs are a fine conduit for new lottery revenue, however much, isn’t so good. The programs are diffuse and complicated, so much so that the state can’t give all the money away. To expand college going, Arkansas needs to send more kids to college. Basically, the lottery should finance a generally available subsidy to any student with a high school record — above average — indicative of likely success in college. It shouldn’t be tailored to interests, geography or need. It has to be marketed. Halter is right in saying the existing system doesn’t work. Numbers show it.

Advertisement

In the matter of Beebe v. Halter at the legislature, of course, Beebe wins. But I’m not sure Beebe’s sentiments expressed here are universally held at the legislature. Sen. Terry Smith of Hot Springs, The Brotherhood’s lottery leader, seemed to say to me the other day that he favored the more universal approach described by Halter.

Invest in the future of great journalism in Arkansas

Join the ranks of the 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts who know that the Arkansas Times is the go-to source for tough, determined, and feisty journalism that holds the powerful accountable. For 50 years, our progressive, alternative newspaper in Little Rock has been on the front lines of the fight for truth, and with your support, we can do even more. By subscribing or donating to the Arkansas Times, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers and expand our coverage. Don't miss out on the opportunity to make a difference with your subscription or donation to the Arkansas Times today.

Previous article A&E news, Dec. 18 Next article Reporters are human, too