SAVE WORKERS? Not exactly, budget office says of legislation backed by Tom Cotton.

U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor’s campaign is touting a Congressional Budget Office study released this week that details the harsh effects of health care legislation favored by his opponent, Republican Rep. Tom CottonThe CBO said it would increase the federal deficit and force a million people off private health insurance. The legislation is known as the Save American Workers Act.

Cotton defenders respond with earlier CBO figures on reduction in job hours on account of the Affordable Care Act (not a loss of 2.5 million jobs as Tom Cotton continues to claim.)


Shaila Dewan wrote in the New York Times Sunday on the seemingly perverse idea that a reduction in full-time hours as a result of expanded mandatory health coverage could have a positive impact.

 In a sense, Obamacare amounts to a massive transfer of risk. Under the old system, if you quit your job and couldn’t get health insurance, you courted financial ruin every time you did something as mundane as riding your bike or playing pickup basketball. Now that risk is distributed to everyone who buys health insurance (including the government). Free of the massive financial risk of being alive, unemployed Americans can more easily take on risks associated with doing what they want to do.

Though this is a good thing for people like Braun [someone who started a business], it doesn’t look good for the labor force as a whole — at least on the surface. In February, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the Affordable Care Act would reduce employment by the equivalent of 2.5 million full-time jobs. Opponents seized on this as evidence that Obamacare is a job killer. But that’s not what the C.B.O. meant. “The estimated reduction stems almost entirely from a net decline in the amount of labor that workers choose to supply, rather than from a net drop in businesses’ demand for labor,” the report says. In other words, if people work less, it will be by choice.

It may seem counterintuitive, but from an economics perspective, this is a good thing, because it encourages the labor force to allocate itself more efficiently. Older workers will finally be able to retire, leaving openings for younger workers. People will switch to jobs that better suit their talents. Parents will be able to spend more time with their families. Such changes don’t always make people wealthier, but they make people happier.

The Pryor campaign cites, on the other hand, the CBO report on the Cotton legislation, which would add $73 billion annually to the deficit, knock 1 million people off coverage, add 500,000 people to Medicaid, make 500,000 uninsured and cause a reduction in workers’ hours. All of the ill effects of Obamacare and more, in other words, with none of the benefits of expansion of protection for Americans.