Easy come, easy go. The University of Arkansas, which announced May 12 that it would in the future provide insurance benefits to spouses of same-sex married UA employees, has now made it clear that policy can’t take effect on account of the Arkansas Supreme Court’s stay of Judge Chris Piazza’s May 9 marriage equality ruling.

A memorandum from UA System General Counsel Fred Harrison noted that the original memo said the policy would take effect unless a stay was granted.

Advertisement

Harrison’s memo, dated today, said the situation is the same for all UA employees, whether married before Piazza’s ruling or in the few days it was in effect until the stay last Friday.

“Otherwise, both tthe University and individuals concerned would run the risk of entering into legal relationships about important matters such as health care which later might be overturned. Also, this affords same-sex partners of University employees relying on Judge Piazza’s opinion and final order and my memorandum of May 12 to obtain insurance coverage ogther than under the University’s medical benefit plan. Any premiums which may have been, or will be, deducted for employees enrolling should be refunded. I also note that under University’s plan no coverage would begin until June 1, 2014 and current coverage is not affected.

This is a particular problem for people who just registered for benefits. The UAMS Human Resources office, in telling them of the UA memo, said:

Advertisement

I am sending this via blind copy to our employees who recently added their same-sex spouses to insurance or made a new flexible spending account election.

Today the University of Arkansas System Office announced that same-sex spouses cannot be added to benefits at this time. Click here for the announcement just posted on our intranet site. It includes the letter from the UA System Office explaining this decision.

I regret that this action was taken, but can understand why it was made. Until this court case is over, the legality of your marriage in Arkansas — whether that marriage occurred here or in another state — is uncertain. We want to make sure the benefit elections you make will ‘stick’ and that your family will be assured of coverage.

I am going to hold your benefit forms until June 20, in the hopes that this case is resolved by then and we can proceed with your benefit changes. But if that doesn’t occur, let me know if you want the forms back or if it’s okay for me to shred them. Then once this is resolved and the University gives the thumbs up, please be sure to visit our office again to complete new forms.

Thank you for your patience!

Please note the advice that a person legally married in another state may not be viewed as such in Arkansas. This is the part of the Arkansas marriage prohibition that simply cannot withstand court challenge.

Arkansas Times: Your voice in the fight

Are you tired of watered-down news and biased reporting? The Arkansas Times has been fighting for truth and justice for 50 years. As an alternative newspaper in Little Rock, we are tough, determined, and unafraid to take on powerful forces. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, we are making a difference. But we can't do it without you. Join the 3,400 paid subscribers who support our great journalism and help us hire more writers. Sign up for a subscription today or make a donation of as little as $1 and help keep the Arkansas Times feisty for years to come.

Previous article Marriage equality arrives in Pennsylvania Next article Oxford American unveils Summer 2014 issue