“Don Tworry, president of the University of A Few Miles Outside Earle on Highway 149, said the state’s system of higher education has become more efficient in recent years with partnerships between and among colleges.”
Not just between, but also among. Dr. Tworry is observing the old rule that between is used to express a relationship involving two persons or things (“Just between you and me, she’s older than she says”), and among is used when the relationship involves more than two (“At first slowly, then more rapidly, disillusionment spread among Bush’s supporters”).
But it’s a little more complicated than that. Random House says that between “also continues to be used, as it has been throughout its entire history, to express a relationship of persons or things considered individually, no matter how many: Between holding public office, teaching, and writing, she has little free time.”

Couldn’t we just say that mistakes were made?
From a letter to the editor of a church newspaper: “I take issue with several of David Doe’s statements on John Paul II’s legacy, but space will only permit me to address the one in the fifth paragraph. He calls the flagitious behavior of the priests in the sex scandal ‘inappropriate sexual behavior.’ Mr. Doe needs a dictionary.
“Belching in polite company is inappropriate behavior. The priests’ behavior could be described as ‘debauchery,’ ‘a heinous criminal act,’ ‘an abomination to the Lord,’ ‘a vile act,’ ‘a loathsome beastly sin’ or ‘a horrifying crime.’ ”

Flagitious does not refer, as one might think, to football officials who throw penalty flags when they shouldn’t, and don’t throw them when they should. It means “shamefully wicked” or “infamous.”
Come to think of it, I’ve seen refs who were flagitious even by that definition. Most of those who’ve worked the Arkansas-Texas games, in fact.

Kenneth, what are the frequency?
Bob Lancaster notes that while the daily newspaper was ridiculing a state legislator for saying “The winds of change is blowing,” on the same day in the same section of the paper one of its own columnists was writing “And what is the criteria?”

Be a part of something bigger

As a reader of the Arkansas Times, you know we’re dedicated to bringing you tough, determined, and feisty journalism that holds the powerful accountable. For 50 years, we've been fighting the good fight in Little Rock and beyond – with your support, we can do even more. By becoming a subscriber or donating as little as $1 to our efforts, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be helping us hire more writers to expand our coverage and continue to bring important stories to light. With over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, it's clear that our readers value our great journalism. Join us in the fight for truth.

Previous article Lemony and sweet Next article What we’re reading