Jerry Robbins of Ann Arbor, Mich., writes: “In the July 8 issue of the Times, [a well-loved columnist] stated, ‘If there was money at stake …’ Shouldn’t that be ‘If there WERE money at stake …’? Or does the Times syle manual support the abandonment of the use of the subjunctive?”

The Times style manual is kept under lock and key at the Smithsonian, like Dillinger’s relic, but I don’t believe that it calls for total abandonment. It may call for tough love. Some authorities believe the subjunctive should be used only in discussing a circumstance that is clearly contrary to fact, such as, “If I were you.” In the example Robbins cites, the writer may have felt there was a question about whether money would or would not be at stake, and therefore chose was. But I’m just guessing here.

Advertisement

“Many Arkansans have lost plenty in the economic downturn and it is infuriating to hear government fat cats rubbing it in their noses.”

Ray White writes, “I believe the phrase is ‘rubbing their noses in it.’ ” So do I. Though ‘twould be unpleasant either way, I suppose. (OK, the ‘twould is for a friend who cottons to words like whilst and amongst. Methinks he’ll go for ‘twould too.)

Advertisement

The relentless White also nabbed “Most of the participants … had never stepped foot in the South.” He notes that set foot is the real deal, and asks “Don’t linguists have a name for a phrase that is misunderstood and then the misunderstanding overtakes the original?”

They may, but I can’t find it. Unless White is thinking of mondegreen (“a word or phrase that results from a mishearing of something said or sung”), but a mondegreen never drives out the original. Some people may say “for all intensive purposes” but it doesn’t replace “for all intents and purposes” in standard English. Everyone who’s interested probably already knows that the word mondegreen comes from “Lady Mondegreen,” a mishearing of a line from an old folk song, “laid him on the green.”

Advertisement

Be a Part of the Fight

Step up and make a difference by subscribing or donating to the Arkansas Times, the progressive, alternative newspaper in Little Rock that's been fighting for truth for 50 years. Our tough, determined, and feisty journalism has earned us over 63,000 Facebook followers, 58,000 Twitter followers, 35,000 Arkansas blog followers, and 70,000 daily email blasts, all of whom value our commitment to holding the powerful accountable. But we need your help to do even more. By subscribing or donating, you'll not only have access to all of our articles, but you'll also be supporting our efforts to hire more writers and expand our coverage. Join us in the fight for truth by subscribing or donating to the Arkansas Times today.

Previous article Can’t we get along? Next article Public Access and Revisionist History